Ableton Live Tutorials

...Help and resources for Ableton's Live Audio Production Software

Studio

...now browsing by tag

 
 

Q&A: How do you get a professional, studio quality guitar tone with Ableton Live?

Sunday, January 29th, 2012

Question by Ken Venom: How do you get a professional, studio quality guitar tone with Ableton Live?
I’m trying to figure out how to achieve a heavy guitar tone similar to that of Devin Townsend of Strapping Young lad, if not specifically his tone, then just a proffesional quality metal tone, and a clear, professional quality clean tone.

The details are, that I’m using a Dean (Z Model) With Dimebucker, and a Jackson with EMG passive pickups. I’m running my guitar through my Roland Cube 30 which goes into my audio in on my mac, which is running Ableton live 5.

Please share your thoughts, advice and experiances with me please. Thank you for taking the time to read this.

Best answer:

Answer by Franco
To start off, which program you are using to record (Live) is not too significant.

What is significant is what goes into it and how it gets there. To help you, I would need a few more details.

Are you happy with the tone you are getting from that guitar/amp combination? If so, is it losing something in the recording process?

How does the signal get into the audio input on your Mac? Are you connecting a line out from the amp or using a microphone?

A few thoughts come to mind:

1. The best guitar tones I have gotten in the studio have come from miking an amp. In order to do that, you would need an audio interface for the computer that has a good quality mic preamp. A decent dynamic mic, like an SM57 would be good to start with. Then you would basically crank up the amp, work on your tone ’til you’re happy, put the mic in front of the speaker and press record. Experiment with the distance between the amp and mic. It should be pretty close. Start around 1 foot away.

2. The built in audio input on the Mac is decent, but not really pro quality. It would also be very easy to overload. A separate USB or Firewire based interface, as mentioned above, would improve the sound and allow you the flexibility to adjust input levels.

3. At any heavy rock sessions I have been involved with, the guitarists used Marshall, Mesa, Fender or any number of pro level tube amps. While I’m sure a Cube-30 is a cool little amp, you’re going to have to work hard to get that type of sound from it.

I am not trying to discourage you or make you spend all your money on gear though. I encourage your efforts and suggest reading up on guitar amp miking and audio engineering in general. There is a lot of info out there.

Also, have a look at audio interfaces for your Mac. I like the Motu line. This one is compact, not too expensive and sounds great:

http://www.motu.com/products/motuaudio/ultralite/

It comes with recording software that is a bit easier to use for live recording than Ableton.

Best of luck to you.

peace

.

What do you think? Answer below!

ableton live 8 or fl studio 9?

Sunday, January 22nd, 2012

Question by : ableton live 8 or fl studio 9?
I am getting into producing and i am going to be using vst plugins which will be vst instruments and effects. Which program of the two handles these the best and which of the two has the better workflow? I am also going to be recording vocals. Thank you for your time and answers.

Best answer:

Answer by audioloops
I use both FL Studio Producer Edition and Ableton Live, and my personal preference is for FL Studio. It just works best for me, the workflow is great. Handling of plug-ins is not problematic with both of these. Just try the demo versions and see what works best for you:

http://demo.flstudio.com

http://www.ableton.com/download

In case you end up getting FL Studio, you can get 10% discount on your first order from image-line with this promo link for new customers: https://support.image-line.com/jshop/shop.php?offer=Default&promo=BACJBAA468

Just make sure you get the right version. The demo is basically the same as the Producer Edition, except for some of the generators like Sytrus and Directwave that are only available in the Signature Bundle. You can compare the versions here: http://flstudio.image-line.com/documents/features.html

Good luck!

Give your answer to this question below!

Q&A: Is there such a thing like Cubase 5 & Ableton Live 8 can do that FL Studio 9 cant?

Monday, December 12th, 2011

Question by Arafat: Is there such a thing like Cubase 5 & Ableton Live 8 can do that FL Studio 9 cant?
I have a question in my mind since very long, seems like no one can give a good answer :(
I know there had been going so much debate on choosing sequencers. What is the truth actualy?
Can somebody tell me is there big difference between Ableton Live 8, FL Studio 9 & Cubase 5? Is there such a thing like Cubase & Ableton can do something which FL cant? As far as i know all the professionals use Cubase,Logic or Pro Tools. Why?? Is there something that they can do but FL cant? Im already a fluent FL user, and im just into Trance music (sometimes Classical). Will FL serve me well? Or it has some lack of abilities?

Best answer:

Answer by Drexl
FL Studio is just as good as a sequencer, it’s just that the sounds it comes with are amateur. So it can be expensive to find professional samples to put into it. But with professional samples, it’s just as good as any sequencer. Things like Cubase and Pro Tools are better for recording, but as sequencers, they don’t offer any advantage, it’s just preference. If you think you will be recording lots of live instruments or vocals, then they are much better. If you are just going to be making instrumentals and trance music, then FL Studio is professional enough. I’m certified in Pro Tools and have a Digi 002. But I only use it for recording. I prefer to use FL Studio for sequencing and making instrumentals/beats.

Some people also use those programs because they feel it will make them look more professional to others, since so many amateurs use FL Studio. This doesn’t mean the programs are better though. Also, they may use those programs because it’s easier to export things for use in a studio. For example, if you need your music mixed and want to pay professionals to mix it, then something like Pro Tools is better because then you can send a project file if the studio you are sending it to also has Pro Tools. If you’re using FL Studio, then you would have to export each track individually and put them on a hard drive or cd to send away. You couldn’t just send a project file, because the other studio would need FL Studio to open the project file. That is one small advantage, but I don’t think it’s worth upgrading for. It may be time consuming to export each file, but it’s not worth extra money just to save a little time. If you mix your own music, then all of this doesn’t matter.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Powered by Yahoo! Answers